June 13, 2005
Are Pro-Illegal Alien Activists Racist?
In a two-part series covering the issue of racism as it pertains to illegal immigration, MichNews.com guest columnist Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D argues that in spite of the widespread stereotype to the contrary, if the term "racist" must be pinned on one of the parties involved in the battle over illegal immigration, then it is NOT the anti-illegal immigration folk who deserve that dubious distinction. Instead, Peterson offers that it is actually the pro-illegal alien groups that are racist; he then goes on to support his hypothesis of the existence of "blatant racism by the pro-illegal alien crowd" with very well-organized, well-documented, and logical data.
"If eighty to ninety percent of the 18-20 million illegal aliens here in America today, had come from Australia, Canada, and England instead of actually coming from Hispanic and Latino countries, would La Raza (The Race), LULAC, MALDEF, MEChA, and the ACLU, et al, be loudly advocating for open borders, protesting and demanding that illegal aliens receive driver's licenses, in-state tuition, and the end to Prop.200?" So begins Peterson's argument that it is really the pro-illegal alien groups that are racist, not the anti-illegal alien groups.
Is your interest piqued yet? If so, read on...
Blatant Racism by the Pro-Illegal Alien Crowd, Part I
Blatant Racism by the Pro-Illegal Alien Crowd, Part II
Posted by Kasey on June 13, 2005 12:56 PM | Filed Under: Conservative Thinking , ImmigrationSince having run into MECha groups back in college, their race-based agenda was pretty transparent.
Posted by: -keith in mtn. view on June 15, 2005 06:45 PM
